The case for excavating ideas

Technology creators are leading the battle of ideas about the future. Sutskever, Altman, and Aschenbrenner all discuss the nature of reality and the outlook for intelligence, with a prominence that marked the most distinguished and experienced thinkers before. Today, what gets public attention comes from tech people in their thirties instead of, as it used to be, recognized intellectuals in their sixties. 

What the people of Silicon Valley loudly say resonates thanks to the market, which echoes their predictions like a resonance chamber, resounding with a mirage of future products, services, and improvements. Because the market works as an instrument for them, when they say, they sell too. 

Their revolutionary ideas are for sale to investors. Those reverberate in nonfiction books that are also products to be sold (especially books on AI) — the same with commercial keynote addresses, podcasts, and multiple other formats. 

Yet amplifying market influence is not the biggest issue here. On my journey of writing the book “Re-becoming“, I realized that most of the things we’re discussing today are actually not new. The math behind LLMs is novel, but not the fundamental underpinnings of progress or its results for us, such as:

  • outlook for human intelligence
  • machine learning 
  • human learning from machines
  • obsolescence of man

Nothing new under the sun

These ideas were discussed by the most prominent thinkers of the pre-digital era with shocking, up-to-date conclusions we often know little of. And if relevant clues have already been drawn, why not use them today?

Today’s tech gurus have no time for it. They need to catch up to the competition, so looking in the rear mirror seems a time-waster. The market would not allow it anyway, as a glance at the rear mirror would distract them from the race they are in. 

The market also seemed not to be standing in the way so much before. And when it did, like for some of the wealthiest thinkers I cite in my book, they gave their fortunes away, freeing their intellectual powers from the market’s influence. By that, their testament is, in many ways, more honest and revealing.

See what’s included the book

Check the Table of Contents

By deciding to reintroduce their voice to the modern reader, I had to adjust their language to meet our present context.  In technical jargon, it’s called ‘refactoring’ — when the code is rewritten to meet certain new criteria. In entertainment, it’s called ‘reboots’ when, for example, Spiderman movies are re-released repeatedly to update the franchise’s universal story and message to remain relevant.  We don’t have much of ‘refactors’ or ‘reboots’ in knowledge pursuits, and that’s why I decided to give it my best shot by writing ‘Re-Becoming’

The book is riddled with bits of brilliance from people who pondered progress and technology across ages to come out with an enlightening message. For example: 

  • Learning from artificial creations was discussed already in 1810 by Heinrich von Kleist
  • The Obsolescence of Man was a theme behind many works, including Gunther Anders after II WW,
  • The overuse of language and boiling meaning from it took place a century ago through the work of Wittgenstein,
  • The Outlook for Intelligence impacted by technology was brilliantly explored by Paul Valery, also a hundred years back

There’s so much material that I did my best to fill the storyline with the most hitting ideas. At the end of the process, I felt cheated by the education system for not including these fundamental thoughts in the curriculum. As a practitioner in the tech industry and a humanist at heart, I had to do the work of re-sewing the fabric of my own thought. That led me to write “Re-becoming”. I share it now with the hope it supports the intellectual pursuit of others.   

Prior to the release…

sign up for free Chapter One

…and get notified when the book is ready
Read Chapter One